How does it compare with classic docking

Ask, share, and solve problems with our support team.
Trisheye
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:22 am

How does it compare with classic docking

Post by Trisheye »

Hi, I recently tested Edock and it came up with a nice resulting docking pose. I'm working on a project in which I need to run many (several thousands) of dockings and, before getting into the standalone code, I would like to know roughly its efficiency in terms of cpu time. Do you have any rough estimate about the time per docking? how does it compare with classic docking, eg Vina? Thanks!
zbiao
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:27 am

Re: How does it compare with classic docking

Post by zbiao »

EDock’s average running time:2.02 h
AutoDock Vina average running time:0.33 min.
zbiao
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2024 11:27 am

Re: How does it compare with classic docking

Post by zbiao »

tested on two large-scale datasets from DUDE and COACH
EDock’s average running time:2.02 h
AutoDock Vina average running time:0.33 min.

For details, you can refer to the article https://zhanggroup.org/papers/2020_19.pdf
Post Reply